Abortion is legal in Maine! Learn More

Author Archives: Aspen Ruhlin

  1. Kink Engagement Among Youth and Concerns

    Comments Off on Kink Engagement Among Youth and Concerns

    by Danica Soule (they/she), University of Maine Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies student and Mabel Wadsworth Center intern

    Language Disclaimer: In this blog, I will be switching between using choking/strangulation – choking is described as something being stuck in your throat, while strangulation is when someone uses an object or their hands to cut off airflow. However, in both the kink community and in common language, “choking” is often the language used. While accuracy is important, it’s also important to use understandable language. 

    IPV: An acronym for Intimate Partner Violence- Abuse that occurs in a romantic relationship past or present. Abuse can be physical, emotional, sexual, psychological, stalking, financial control,  etc. 

    If you or someone you know is struggling with interpersonal violence, or domestic violence please contact a local help center. 

    To reach Partners for Peace’s domestic abuse helpline, call 1-800-863-9909.

     

    Now, let’s talk about kinks! Kinks are making their way from private underground parties to your misspelling on a Google search. As technology advances within our society, so does the ability to access just about anything you can think of, and one of these things you can think of is sex. A majority of public schools are underfunded, leaving their sexuality education program at the bottom of the barrel. Alongside underfunding, we see schools that teach abstinence-only sex education, shaming the act of sex, or simply not teaching a sexuality education program at all. Let’s keep in mind that a lack of education does not stop teen pregnancy. In fact, we know this to be a precipitating factor in increasing the rate of teen pregnancy. The lack of comprehensive sex ed programs and funding has the youth searching for any information on the topic of sex out on the internet. Unfortunately when it comes to the internet, when you try to find the answers to your questions like “how to kiss girls,” “how to masturbate,” “how to have sex,” or “how to give a blow job,” the first few links are highly unlikely to be trustworthy, science-based sexual health information, but performative porn instead. When it comes to watching porn, the production of the film is for the entertainment and pleasure of viewers, not for educational purposes. However, with our lack of sex ed, and how taboo the topic of sex is in our culture, young folks can feel as though porn will be the best place to get advice. People, especially those with less experience, can be impressionable, and when they have no basis for the topic they are trying to learn about they will take whatever information they can in hopes that it’s correct. 

    In porn, even porn that’s not considered kinky (aka “vanilla”), there are acts of erotic asphyxiation. Erotic asphyxiation involves cutting off air supply on either yourself or your partner, to create a sexual thrill between either giver, receiver, or both.  This is considered strangulation, but is referred to in the kink world as sexual suffocation/choking. Sexual choking can lead to life-threatening circumstances. It’s essential for anyone engaging in this practice to know how to properly communicate boundaries, safe words/actions, proper and safe techniques, along with consent. These are important factors as well when it comes to engaging in any kinks/play with a partner, but especially kinks that can lead to serious and/or fatal injuries.

     

     Anecdotally, educators/counselors are reporting that youth (12-21) report being strangled/choked unexpectedly by their partner. In one case, an educator had 15 and 16 year old girls asking why boys want to choke them during intimacy and boys asking why girls want to be choked. Now, this question from the boys feels simultaneously disingenuous and genuine. On the one hand, as an analogy, most people wouldn’t watch a bunch of movies where women eat spaghetti and assume all women want to eat spaghetti for every meal, let alone that all women even like spaghetti. On the other hand, our society teaches young men and boys that consent and communication around sex are difficult and complicated, and that many sex acts are to be “assumed” as part of sex. Porn is normalizing rough sex and choking/strangulation to the point where some consider this “vanilla” and young people see this as what the other person presumably wants or what they should be wanting. 

     Alongside porn, we see the act of sexual strangulation trending on social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram reels, where teen boys and young men make “thirst traps” imitating sexually choking another person. These “thirst trap” videos that sexualize choking/strangulation normalize the act to the viewers without any other context, like how communication and consent should be involved before attempting a risky kink, the importance of not performing these behaviors in public settings, and the fact that these are kinks! These are not vanilla acts that are standard to engage in during sex–these are kinks that need to be discussed (as, frankly, all sex acts should be). 

    At times, erotic asphyxiation is a disguise for abuse and is NOT being used in a way to bring pleasure to both parties but as a tool of power, control, and violence. Abusers want control over their victims and can disguise their want by using strangulation claiming it’s an act of BDSM to inflict serious pain on their victim. Strangulation is used to instill fear, secure compliance to the abuser, sexual gratification for the abuser, and used to avoid accountability for abusive threatening behavior by avoiding leaving marks. Strangulation is one of the most prominent indicators that abuse in a relationship is escalating to lethal levels and is associated with a “significant predictor of IPV-based homicide”(Mckay). In IPV homicide cases 82% of victims identify with being female, and approximately 15% of these homicides were due to strangulation. Victims who are sexually assaulted by a past or present intimate partner are 8.4x more likely to endure non-fatal frequent strangulation, and the occurrence rate of non-fatal strangulation over the course of a victim’s life can range from 3-68%. Each time a victim survives a non-fatal strangulation, their chances of being a victim to homicide increases.

     Instead of normalizing risky sex acts without consent or communication, we need to normalize conversations. It can be hard to answer these questions, and even harder to hear them be asked, especially as BDSM-play trends around social media. We know porn can be harmful and that it’s easy to shift the blame onto the internet, but we also know that shaming those who lack healthy resources won’t make them stop what they’re doing. Shame leads to guilt, repression, and anger. Fighting against rape culture and the normalization of violence along with removing shame around sex generally allows everyone, especially those with less experience, the space to ask questions, learn, and communicate in healthy ways.

  2. Mabel Wadsworth Center Statement Regarding EMTALA

    Comments Off on Mabel Wadsworth Center Statement Regarding EMTALA

     

    We are horrified and appalled that the Trump administration has made the unconscionable decision to revoke the guidance under EMTALA requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortion care for patients even in states where abortion is banned. The medical care available to someone should not depend on their ZIP code. An individual’s autonomy should not depend on their ZIP code. The inherent humanity of pregnant people should not depend on their ZIP code.

    We have already seen lives taken by abortion bans, even with EMTALA requiring emergency medical interventions to preserve the lives of patients, including in the form of abortion care. Politicians who implement these bans know that they are killing pregnant people. The cruelty is the point. Control is the point.

    Abortion remains legal and available in Maine, including at Mabel Wadsworth Center. We are honored to provide this normal, needed care.

     

  3. If you actually care about cis women’s safety, you have to care about trans women’s safety

    Comments Off on If you actually care about cis women’s safety, you have to care about trans women’s safety

    Aspen Ruhlin (they/them) Mabel Wadsworth Center Community Engagement Manager

     

    Transphobia causes significant harm to transgender people across the spectrum, whether in the form of physical violence or social othering, and many things in between. This fact is enough reason to take action and oppose this hate. While all trans people are harmed by transphobia, trans women and transfeminine folks often face the brunt of this harm, as they are most often the victims of transphobic violence and are frequently targeted socially and with anti-trans legislation. We’ve seen this targeting across the country and here in Maine, with the harassment and doxxing of a trans minor by a certain State Representative and the multiple pieces of proposed legislation attacking trans women and girls in sports. It is abhorrent, and it is inexcusable. 

    Harm to trans people is enough reason to oppose transphobia in any form, but we know that hate harms more than its named targets. We have seen time and again cis people, particularly cis women, harmed by misdirected transphobia. This makes perfect sense when we remember that, ultimately, transphobia is a tool of the patriarchy. 

    Patriarchal power structures demand an adherence to a rigid binary that simply doesn’t exist in nature. If this rigid binary did exist naturally, no one would have to try to force themselves or others into it. In this system, women are expected to be petite, weak, lacking in body hair, and more. These characteristics, along with being rooted in white supremacy, either require significant effort to achieve, like hair removal, or are just not possible for many women to fit into. Plenty of cis women are tall, like Gwendoline Christie and Meg thee Stallion, and will never fit the patriarchy’s rigid notion of acceptable womanhood. With Meg thee Stallion in particular and her experience as a tall Black woman, we see the intersections of misogyny, misdirected transphobia, and racism.

    Transphobia is a tool of the patriarchy to police all women’s bodies, trans and cis alike. We saw this play out on a global stage in the 2024 Summer Olympics with the “transvestigation” of Imane Khelif, an Algerian women’s boxer who was accused of being trans for not fitting white notions of femininity. Recently, a cis woman was kicked out of a bathroom in Boston after being falsely accused of being trans. It’s important to note that it is legal for trans people to use the bathroom associated with their gender in Massachusetts.

    As transphobia gains more visibility, we unsurprisingly see more cis women experiencing misdirected transphobia. Trans people are the named target of transphobia, but transphobia works to control cis people as well, forcing them to either adopt narrow expressions of gender or risk harassment. Even when misdirected transphobia isn’t on the table, the same patriarchal values that uplift transphobic beliefs harm cis people, particularly cis women. One example of this is physical strength. We are bombarded with messages from birth that women are inherently weak, though we know this isn’t true. When women are discouraged from being strong, who benefits?

    Every attempt at defining womanhood in a way to exclude trans women also excludes countless cis women. Every attack on trans women is a direct attack on countless cis women and an indirect attack on the rest. If you actually care about cis women’s safety, you have to care about trans women’s safety.

  4. Organizations Unite to Condemn Harassment of Maine Youth

    Comments Off on Organizations Unite to Condemn Harassment of Maine Youth

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
    February 25, 2025

    Organizations Unite to Condemn Harassment of Maine Youth

    Coalition stands together to call for adults to protect children from harassment

     

    AUGUSTA, ME – Last week, an elected official used her online social media to share a photo of a child that she identified as transgender, resulting in statewide and national harassment of a non-consenting minor.

    Our organizations stand united in declaring that adults should never harass, ‘out’, or instigate attacks on minors. All children deserve our safety and protection, so they can feel safe at home, at school, and in their communities.

    This year, dozens of bills have been filed that seek to threaten, roll back, or undermine the rights of trans people in our state. As these bills go through their hearings, language will get heated and tempers will get high. We urge legislators and Legislative leadership to remember that children and private citizens are off-limits, and personal attacks go against Maine values, basic decency, and endanger families. It is never okay for people in positions of power to use their roles to draw attention or harassment toward people who are just trying to live their lives with privacy and safety.

    We all want what’s best for our children. We expect our leaders will have a plan to keep the focus on the policy, not on personal attacks, and to hold policymakers accountable when their actions cause harm.

    Affirming Behavioral Health
    affirmingbehavioralhealth.org

    Campfire Institute
    campfireinstitute.org

    Confluence Collective

    confluencecollective.org

    Defend Our Health

    defendourhealth.org

    Equality Community Center
    eccmaine.org

    EqualityMaine

    equalitymaine.org

    Grandmothers for Reproductive Rights
    grrnow.org

    Hardy Girls
    hardygirls.org

    Kindling Collective
    kindlingcollective.org

    Little Chair Printing
    littlechairprinting.com

    Mabel Wadsworth Center
    mabelwadsworth.org

    Maine Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics
    maineaap.org

    Maine Children’s Alliance
    mainechildrensalliance.org

    Maine Council of Churches 

    mainecouncilofchurches.org

    Maine Equal Justice
    maineequaljustice.org

    Maine Family Planning
    mainefamilyplanning.org

    Maine Medical Association
    mainephysicians.org

    Maine Osteopathic Association
    mainedo.org

    Maine Public Health Association
    mainepublichealth.org

    Maine Women’s Lobby
    mainewomen.org

    Maine Youth Power
    maineyouthpower.org

    MaineTransNet
    mainetrans.net

    Multi-faith Justice Maine
    mainepeoplesalliance.org

    NASW Maine Chapter
    naswme.socialworkers.org

    OUT Maine
    outmaine.org

    Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
    ppnne.org

    Portland Outright
    portlandoutright.org

    Prevention. Action. Change.
    pacmaine.com

    SAFE Maine
    safemaine.org

    Southern Maine Workers’ Center

    maineworkers.org

    Speak About It Inc

    wespeakaboutit.org

  5. Roe Anniversary 2025

    Comments Off on Roe Anniversary 2025

    Aspen Ruhlin (they/them) Mabel Wadsworth Center Community Engagement Manager

     

    This year would be, should be, the 52nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade being the law of the land. While the protections of Roe were insufficient and Reproductive Justice was not realized under them, the loss of those protections is something to be mourned. Roe was the floor, not the ceiling, and while it was a rickety floor, we are certainly worse off without it.  

    Those who fight against access to abortion care call themselves “pro-life,” but they are anything but. To oppose abortion access is to assert that you view pregnant people as nothing more than an incubator with legs. To oppose abortion access is to loudly and confidently state your misogyny. To oppose abortion access is to believe that the life and autonomy of a real, breathing person matters less than a theoretical life.  

    It is important to note here that abortion access is always essential. Someone does not need to have a medical emergency or be a victim of sexual assault to deserve control over their body. There is no circumstance where a pregnant person does not deserve autonomy. 

    Since the Supreme Court ruled on the Dobb’s decision and removed the protections of Roe in the United States, people have still had abortions. Banning abortion does not stop it from happening. It does, however, cause significant harm both in the form of criminalization and injury or death for those who can’t access the abortion care they need. We have seen people punished for self-managing abortions and for having miscarriages. Brittany Watts, a woman from Ohio, was criminalized for seeking medical care when she miscarried a pregnancy. She’s now filing a suit that argues that nurses and police conspired to fabricate evidence against her. 

    We know that abortion bans kill people. Unfortunately, while we may never know all of them, the names of some of those killed by abortion bans following the Dobbs decision have started to trickle out. Every single one of these people should still be here today. 

    Amber Nicole Thurman died in Georgia in 2022 only 2 weeks after the state’s abortion ban went into effect and hospital staff allowed her infection from retained fetal tissue to worsen without providing adequate medical care. It feels wrong to say that Amber left behind her young son and many loved ones, because her life was taken by a system that devalues the lives of pregnant people. 

    Candi Miller, also in Georgia and only a few months later, died at home when her body did not expel all of the fetal tissue after a medication abortion, as she justifiably feared that she would not receive the medical care she needed due to Georgia’s abortion ban. Candi is mourned by her husband, two children, and other loved ones. 

    Josseli Barnica died in Texas in September of 2021. While the Dobbs decision had not yet been passed down by the Supreme Court, SB8 was passed in Texas on September 1, 2021 and banned all abortion care beyond 6 weeks gestation. With Roe still considered the law of the land, Josseli was allowed to slowly die of a uterine infection when her pregnancy was no longer viable and hospital staff chose to not intervene, instead waiting for the fetal heartbeat to stop. Josseli suffered for 40 hours before finally passing. Her death bears many similarities to that of Dr. Savita Halappanavar, a dentist in Ireland who died under similar circumstances and whose death was a catalyst for abortion advocacy in the country. In 2018, abortion was legalized in Ireland by referendum vote. Josseli is mourned by her husband, daughter, and other loved ones. 

    Neveah Crain, only 18-years-old, died in Texas in 2023 due to being denied abortion care. She had gone to the hospital three separate times with clear signs of a miscarriage on what was supposed to be the day of her baby shower. Neveah was not provided with adequate medical care at any point, even though the second hospital visit showed she screened positive for sepsis. Her mother begged hospital staff to do something. Neveah suffered organ failure and died after hospital staff refused to save her life. She is mourned by her boyfriend, her mother, and other loved ones. 

    These are just some of the names we know. There are others who have been taken from us that we will never know the names of, and unfortunately, more who will be killed by cruel abortion bans. I have said this before, and I will say it again—there is nothing “pro-life” about being anti-abortion. Anti-abortion politicians, judges, and extremists have blood on their hands. People who are anti-abortion love to clutch their pearls about heartbeats—what about Josseli’s? What about Neveah’s and Amber’s and Candi’s? What about mine? Anti-abortion extremists are clearly not pro-life; they are pro-control. 

    There is never a circumstance where someone should be denied needed care, including abortion care. This is true whether a pregnant person is carrying an unviable pregnancy, has been assaulted, or simply does not want to be pregnant. Abortion is essential and its access should never be hindered. Josseli, Amber, Candi, Neveah, and so many others should still be here. Remember their names when you see anti-abortion protestors outside of clinics or anti-abortion politicians railing against the inherent autonomy of pregnant people.