Abortion is legal in Maine! Learn More

Category Archive: News

  1. (Actual) Threats to Girls’ Sports (hint–it’s not trans people)

    Comments Off on (Actual) Threats to Girls’ Sports (hint–it’s not trans people)

    by Aspen Ruhlin (they/them) Mabel Wadsworth Center Community Engagement Manager

    Content Warning: this blog includes mentions of sexual violence, specifically in regards to minors. Details are not discussed, but we understand this can still be triggering to other victims/survivors of sexual violence and assault. If you are a victim/survivor, please know that we believe you. You are deserving of compassion, support, and safety. If you need support as a victim/survivor yourself or as a loved one of someone who was assaulted, regardless of when it happened, you can call our friends at Rape Response Services (Bangor area) or Maine Coalition Against Sexual Assault (entire state) at 1-800-871-7741. You are not alone.

    While I know myself to be a nonbinary trans person now, I had not yet figured out that piece of my identity as a high schooler. As such, I lived my life as a typical cis teen girl, and as a freshman and sophomore, played on my school’s field hockey team. It was an intensive sport that I still carry both memories of and injuries from almost two decades later: feeling like I was flying as I ran full tilt down the field; the solid thunk as I hit a drive; the hard and heavy ball smashing straight into my exposed ankle. The only athletes at our school that ran more than us were the cross country and track and field kids. Our team didn’t have a great record when it came to wins, but we had a blast and were rugged, strong teens because of the nature of the sport.

    Like most, if not all, high school field hockey teams in Maine, our school only had a girls’ team. Our coaches let us know that because of this and Title IX rules, boys were allowed to try out and potentially play, both at our school and the ones we would play against. We weren’t concerned. In fact, we were hopeful, and immediately sought to recruit a boy or two to try out. This wasn’t because we thought having boys on the team would give us an advantage that would turn around our losing streak (we had gym class with these boys and, to put it as kindly as possible, did not think highly of their strength, stamina, or speed as a general rule). This was because of our uniforms. The standard uniform for girls’ and women’s field hockey is a skirt or kilt. We all hated them. We figured that if we could recruit a boy onto the team, they would never make him wear a skirt, and then to make the whole team uniform aligned, we would get to wear shorts. Our uniform kilts, which were really just black pleated wrap skirts, were short enough that we couldn’t wear them at school without getting a dress code violation. We had to buy our own under shorts to avoid flashing onlookers during games.

    The idea of boys playing with or against us wasn’t a concern, nor was the idea of any trans girls playing. Skill and strength in field hockey or any other sport comes from practice, not chromosomes or genitalia. The cis teen girls playing high school sports aren’t delicate flowers that need to be protected from their trans teammates and opponents–but they do need protection.

    During and after my time as an athlete in high school, both myself and my teen girl classmates were subjected to gendered violence and mistreatment. Some of this looked like the typical prioritization of boys’ sports in our culture, whether in the form of distribution of funding or just how much attention was focused on the boys’ teams vs. the girls’ teams. Some of this looked like the consistent degradation of women and girls by my teen boy peers that went unchallenged by teachers, like when a boy in my class argued that a woman could never be president of the United States because, “once a month, she’d set off the nukes.” Some of this looked like a dress code that existed to control, shame, and sexualize the bodies of teen girls with the argument that we “couldn’t risk distracting the boys.” Some of this looked like the history teacher who, a handful of years after I graduated, was found to be a predator who had been sexually harassing and stalking a 15-year-old student of his. When he committed suicide to evade the consequences, she was blamed and bullied to the point of transferring schools. Some of this looked like being the victim of two different sexually abusive relationships, one of which occurred while I was still a field hockey player. Like many, my physical strength was not enough to prevent me from being assaulted by someone I thought I could trust.

    I was not the only teen girl in my school subjected to gendered violence and mistreatment. I wasn’t even the only one on my field hockey team. Not a single one of us subjected to gendered violence and mistreatment faced harm at the hands of a trans person. Every single one of us who faced harm were harmed by cis boys and men. That doesn’t mean trans people are incapable of causing harm–trans people are people, and people in general can cause harm, intentionally or otherwise. It is very clear, however, whether we look at the anecdotal experiences of people like myself who actually played girls’ high school sports or look at the data and research that the presence of trans girls and women in sports is not a threat. Teen girls, trans and cis alike, face many threats, but inclusion isn’t one of them.

    If you advocate against allowing trans girls to play school sports, I know that you do not care about girls sports or the general safety of cis women and girls. Not think. Know. Transphobia is a tool of patriarchal violence that functions to harm trans people first and cis people second. It works alongside racism and white supremacy to create a narrow vision of girlhood and womanhood that is small, fragile, and weak. I will give some grace and say that, if you are not knowledgeable about women’s and girls’ sports and/or trans people, I can understand being misled into thinking there may be legitimate safety concerns, to a certain degree. With that grace given, it’s also important to be critical of any call to further restrict and scapegoat a marginalized group. It is far too easy for far too many people to immediately accept excluding and fearing trans people without question.

    Trans people are not the enemy. We are not the monster hiding under your bed or in a dark alley. We are part of your community. We are your neighbors, cashiers, family members, librarians, and more. Trans people are a marginalized group far more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators of violence. Trans girls and women deserve to be honored for who they know themselves to be in every sphere of life, and the notion that cis women and girls need to be “protected” from them is one rooted in the devaluation of trans and cis women and girls alike. Seeking to exclude trans girls from school sports is transphobic and misogynistic, plain and simple.

  2. Book Report: Becca Rea-Tucker’s “The Abortion Companion”

    Comments Off on Book Report: Becca Rea-Tucker’s “The Abortion Companion”

    by Sofia Herrington (she/her), Mabel Wadsworth Center intern


    Mabel Wadsworth Center was lucky enough to have multiple copies of Becca Rea-Tucker’s The Abortion Companion: an Affirming Handbook for Your Choice and Your Journey donated to give to patients and keep in our waiting room. Instead of just focusing on how I felt reading through this amazing book, I thought it made more sense to let this powerful piece of writing speak for itself by sharing some of my favorite quotes in the graphics below.

    light purple background with decorative squiggles and quotations in bubbles. Quotations are provided in text of post
    “Whether your abortion was yesterday, thirty years ago, or hasn’t happened yet, you and your feelings are allowed to be on your own timeline.”

     

     

     

     

    “Anger or appreciation. Relief or grief. But our abortion experiences aren’t one-dimensional, and feelings often change over time. There’s no timeline for having feelings about our abortions.”

     

     

     

    light purple background with decorative squiggles and a quotation in a bubble. text of quotation is in post

     

     

     

     

     

    “Pro-choice isn’t meaningful if there isn’t actually a choice.”

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    light purple background with decorative squiggles and bubbles featuring quotes. the quotations can be found in the post “It’s OK that you got pregnant, no matter the circumstances. It’s OK that you decided to not be pregnant, no matter the circumstances.”

     

     

     

    “We have always had and will always have abortions.”

     

     

     

    “No one can make this decision better than you, and you don’t need anyone’s permission. You’re allowed to trust yourself.”

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    “I wrote it to create a comfortable and affirming space for you to sort through your feelings and heal from the wounds inflicted by stigma. I like to think of it as an antidote to shame.”


    Abortions are not only medical procedures, but also often deeply emotional and personal experiences. Time, support, and circumstances have the ability to shape how a person processes their own experiences. This book embraces the different circumstances of abortion, offering a hand of support for anyone– whether they are considering an abortion now, have had one several years ago, or haven’t had one yet. This book creates a safe space to feel all types of emotions and heal themselves, particularly from stigma, without judgment from the world around them.

    You can learn more about this book and snag yourself a copy at Becca Rea-Tucker’s website here.

  3. Kink Engagement Among Youth and Concerns

    Comments Off on Kink Engagement Among Youth and Concerns

    by Danica Soule (they/she), University of Maine Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies student and Mabel Wadsworth Center intern

    Language Disclaimer: In this blog, I will be switching between using choking/strangulation – choking is described as something being stuck in your throat, while strangulation is when someone uses an object or their hands to cut off airflow. However, in both the kink community and in common language, “choking” is often the language used. While accuracy is important, it’s also important to use understandable language. 

    IPV: An acronym for Intimate Partner Violence- Abuse that occurs in a romantic relationship past or present. Abuse can be physical, emotional, sexual, psychological, stalking, financial control,  etc. 

    If you or someone you know is struggling with interpersonal violence, or domestic violence please contact a local help center. 

    To reach Partners for Peace’s domestic abuse helpline, call 1-800-863-9909.

     

    Now, let’s talk about kinks! Kinks are making their way from private underground parties to your misspelling on a Google search. As technology advances within our society, so does the ability to access just about anything you can think of, and one of these things you can think of is sex. A majority of public schools are underfunded, leaving their sexuality education program at the bottom of the barrel. Alongside underfunding, we see schools that teach abstinence-only sex education, shaming the act of sex, or simply not teaching a sexuality education program at all. Let’s keep in mind that a lack of education does not stop teen pregnancy. In fact, we know this to be a precipitating factor in increasing the rate of teen pregnancy. The lack of comprehensive sex ed programs and funding has the youth searching for any information on the topic of sex out on the internet. Unfortunately when it comes to the internet, when you try to find the answers to your questions like “how to kiss girls,” “how to masturbate,” “how to have sex,” or “how to give a blow job,” the first few links are highly unlikely to be trustworthy, science-based sexual health information, but performative porn instead. When it comes to watching porn, the production of the film is for the entertainment and pleasure of viewers, not for educational purposes. However, with our lack of sex ed, and how taboo the topic of sex is in our culture, young folks can feel as though porn will be the best place to get advice. People, especially those with less experience, can be impressionable, and when they have no basis for the topic they are trying to learn about they will take whatever information they can in hopes that it’s correct. 

    In porn, even porn that’s not considered kinky (aka “vanilla”), there are acts of erotic asphyxiation. Erotic asphyxiation involves cutting off air supply on either yourself or your partner, to create a sexual thrill between either giver, receiver, or both.  This is considered strangulation, but is referred to in the kink world as sexual suffocation/choking. Sexual choking can lead to life-threatening circumstances. It’s essential for anyone engaging in this practice to know how to properly communicate boundaries, safe words/actions, proper and safe techniques, along with consent. These are important factors as well when it comes to engaging in any kinks/play with a partner, but especially kinks that can lead to serious and/or fatal injuries.

     

     Anecdotally, educators/counselors are reporting that youth (12-21) report being strangled/choked unexpectedly by their partner. In one case, an educator had 15 and 16 year old girls asking why boys want to choke them during intimacy and boys asking why girls want to be choked. Now, this question from the boys feels simultaneously disingenuous and genuine. On the one hand, as an analogy, most people wouldn’t watch a bunch of movies where women eat spaghetti and assume all women want to eat spaghetti for every meal, let alone that all women even like spaghetti. On the other hand, our society teaches young men and boys that consent and communication around sex are difficult and complicated, and that many sex acts are to be “assumed” as part of sex. Porn is normalizing rough sex and choking/strangulation to the point where some consider this “vanilla” and young people see this as what the other person presumably wants or what they should be wanting. 

     Alongside porn, we see the act of sexual strangulation trending on social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram reels, where teen boys and young men make “thirst traps” imitating sexually choking another person. These “thirst trap” videos that sexualize choking/strangulation normalize the act to the viewers without any other context, like how communication and consent should be involved before attempting a risky kink, the importance of not performing these behaviors in public settings, and the fact that these are kinks! These are not vanilla acts that are standard to engage in during sex–these are kinks that need to be discussed (as, frankly, all sex acts should be). 

    At times, erotic asphyxiation is a disguise for abuse and is NOT being used in a way to bring pleasure to both parties but as a tool of power, control, and violence. Abusers want control over their victims and can disguise their want by using strangulation claiming it’s an act of BDSM to inflict serious pain on their victim. Strangulation is used to instill fear, secure compliance to the abuser, sexual gratification for the abuser, and used to avoid accountability for abusive threatening behavior by avoiding leaving marks. Strangulation is one of the most prominent indicators that abuse in a relationship is escalating to lethal levels and is associated with a “significant predictor of IPV-based homicide”(Mckay). In IPV homicide cases 82% of victims identify with being female, and approximately 15% of these homicides were due to strangulation. Victims who are sexually assaulted by a past or present intimate partner are 8.4x more likely to endure non-fatal frequent strangulation, and the occurrence rate of non-fatal strangulation over the course of a victim’s life can range from 3-68%. Each time a victim survives a non-fatal strangulation, their chances of being a victim to homicide increases.

     Instead of normalizing risky sex acts without consent or communication, we need to normalize conversations. It can be hard to answer these questions, and even harder to hear them be asked, especially as BDSM-play trends around social media. We know porn can be harmful and that it’s easy to shift the blame onto the internet, but we also know that shaming those who lack healthy resources won’t make them stop what they’re doing. Shame leads to guilt, repression, and anger. Fighting against rape culture and the normalization of violence along with removing shame around sex generally allows everyone, especially those with less experience, the space to ask questions, learn, and communicate in healthy ways.

  4. Mabel Wadsworth Center Statement Regarding EMTALA

    Comments Off on Mabel Wadsworth Center Statement Regarding EMTALA

     

    We are horrified and appalled that the Trump administration has made the unconscionable decision to revoke the guidance under EMTALA requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortion care for patients even in states where abortion is banned. The medical care available to someone should not depend on their ZIP code. An individual’s autonomy should not depend on their ZIP code. The inherent humanity of pregnant people should not depend on their ZIP code.

    We have already seen lives taken by abortion bans, even with EMTALA requiring emergency medical interventions to preserve the lives of patients, including in the form of abortion care. Politicians who implement these bans know that they are killing pregnant people. The cruelty is the point. Control is the point.

    Abortion remains legal and available in Maine, including at Mabel Wadsworth Center. We are honored to provide this normal, needed care.

     

  5. If you actually care about cis women’s safety, you have to care about trans women’s safety

    Comments Off on If you actually care about cis women’s safety, you have to care about trans women’s safety

    Aspen Ruhlin (they/them) Mabel Wadsworth Center Community Engagement Manager

     

    Transphobia causes significant harm to transgender people across the spectrum, whether in the form of physical violence or social othering, and many things in between. This fact is enough reason to take action and oppose this hate. While all trans people are harmed by transphobia, trans women and transfeminine folks often face the brunt of this harm, as they are most often the victims of transphobic violence and are frequently targeted socially and with anti-trans legislation. We’ve seen this targeting across the country and here in Maine, with the harassment and doxxing of a trans minor by a certain State Representative and the multiple pieces of proposed legislation attacking trans women and girls in sports. It is abhorrent, and it is inexcusable. 

    Harm to trans people is enough reason to oppose transphobia in any form, but we know that hate harms more than its named targets. We have seen time and again cis people, particularly cis women, harmed by misdirected transphobia. This makes perfect sense when we remember that, ultimately, transphobia is a tool of the patriarchy. 

    Patriarchal power structures demand an adherence to a rigid binary that simply doesn’t exist in nature. If this rigid binary did exist naturally, no one would have to try to force themselves or others into it. In this system, women are expected to be petite, weak, lacking in body hair, and more. These characteristics, along with being rooted in white supremacy, either require significant effort to achieve, like hair removal, or are just not possible for many women to fit into. Plenty of cis women are tall, like Gwendoline Christie and Meg thee Stallion, and will never fit the patriarchy’s rigid notion of acceptable womanhood. With Meg thee Stallion in particular and her experience as a tall Black woman, we see the intersections of misogyny, misdirected transphobia, and racism.

    Transphobia is a tool of the patriarchy to police all women’s bodies, trans and cis alike. We saw this play out on a global stage in the 2024 Summer Olympics with the “transvestigation” of Imane Khelif, an Algerian women’s boxer who was accused of being trans for not fitting white notions of femininity. Recently, a cis woman was kicked out of a bathroom in Boston after being falsely accused of being trans. It’s important to note that it is legal for trans people to use the bathroom associated with their gender in Massachusetts.

    As transphobia gains more visibility, we unsurprisingly see more cis women experiencing misdirected transphobia. Trans people are the named target of transphobia, but transphobia works to control cis people as well, forcing them to either adopt narrow expressions of gender or risk harassment. Even when misdirected transphobia isn’t on the table, the same patriarchal values that uplift transphobic beliefs harm cis people, particularly cis women. One example of this is physical strength. We are bombarded with messages from birth that women are inherently weak, though we know this isn’t true. When women are discouraged from being strong, who benefits?

    Every attempt at defining womanhood in a way to exclude trans women also excludes countless cis women. Every attack on trans women is a direct attack on countless cis women and an indirect attack on the rest. If you actually care about cis women’s safety, you have to care about trans women’s safety.